Adolf Hitler

Adolf Hitler has left-eye syndrome. The left side brow and eye are set lower than right side. The left side eye has a fixated stare, which became manic as Hitler grew older. Left side mouth extension is sorter and presents a slight downward curl in a Right side mouth extension is noticeably longer and presents a neutral expression. The centre brows are always furrowed, illustrating the ever present intensity of Hitler. The left brow muscles are in greater tension than the right, creating permanent creasing over time. The bottom lip is pushed upwards, also an apparently regular expression of defiance by Hitler. The overall impression is that of a sociopath. Emotionless, defiant, manic at times and certainly cruel.

Benito Mussolini

Left eye and brow are set lower on left side of face. Brow muscles are pinched. The mouth is pinched to form a subtle pout. The face is artificially posed. The subject is trying to appear serious, even stern. He wants to be taken seriously. The lower eye muscles are not activated. He appears to be humourless. The lower lip creases appear to be permanent, suggesting the ongoing outward personality of pomposity, inflated ego, superiority complex. "The superiority complex is one of the ways which a person with an inferiority complex may use as a method of escape from his difficulties. He assumes that he is superior when he is not, and this false success compensates him for the state of inferiority which he cannot bear. The normal person does not have a superiority complex, he does not even have a sense of superiority. He has the striving to be superior in the sense that we all have ambition to be successful; but so long as this striving is expressed in work it does not lead to false valuations, which are at the root of mental disease. (Alfred Adler)

Tehillah Niselow

Tehillah Niselow Subjects eyebrows have been cosmetically enhanced which rules out accurate comparison left – right, although left brow appears to be marginally higher set. Horizontal plane through central eye midpoint is regular, with left eye outer presenting slight upward angle. Eye size is marginally increased in left eye. The left side smile is more pronounced than right side. (Uncommon. Usually >80% to rhs) The left side is more expressive and dominant than the right side. (positive aspect) Right side eye/smile combination presents as childlike, or uncomplicated happiness. The orbital muscles are activated with the smile in both sides. The smile is easy and not forced. (positive aspects) This presentation is generally the opposite of left-eye syndrome subjects, whereas the above pictured features are attributable to positive aspects , left-eye syndrome aspects are attributable to depressive dominance, personality imbalance and a predisposition to deceitful behaviour. The positive side in this pic (yang) appears to be mostly dominant. A contented and well adjusted person. Deeply introspective. Impressionable. Honest.

FW DE KLERK_CNN REMARKS

STATEMENT ANALYSIS PROJECT

FW DE KLERK : CNN Interview (May 2012) Explained:
The article below was copied from IAFRICA news website.


"May I remind everybody that it was me, together with the fellow leaders of the National Party, who abolished apartheid on 2 February 1990," he said in Cape Town.

"Why would I have nostalgia for that which I abolished and for that which I apologised? I don't want to get into the twisted interpretation of what I've said."

# To pose a question in an open statement indicates sensitivity at that point, suggesting that the
speaker may be concealing information.
"We know that our education system is in a crisis, we know that people are protesting in the streets about bad delivery, so we're not in a good place in the socio-economic sense of the word.

"Fortunately, we are implementing well-balanced economics, macro-economic policies and I'm not a pessimist at all," he said.

# To report something in the negative is not the norm. The norm would be, “ ...and I’m optimistic about our future, OR, ...and I’m an optimist. “ I would venture that the speaker is in fact pessimistic about the issues he referred to.
"What is wrong in South Africa can be put right and I think that it's time we all join hands, stop shouting at each other and we work together to improve things."
Asked whether he agreed that apartheid was morally repugnant, De Klerk said: "In as much as it trampled human rights it was, and remains, morally indefensible."

# The use of the prefix, “In as much as it ....” was not necessary. The speaker could have given his information in the ‘short way’ > “It trampled human rights. It was, and remains morally indefensible” The use of the unnecessary prefix suggests there are other undisclosed reasons or concealed information that may have rendered apartheid as being morally defensible to the speaker.

De Klerk then reportedly said about the homeland system: "But the concept of giving, as the Czechs have it now, and the Slovaks have it, of saying that ethnic unity with one culture with one language [everyone] can be happy and can fulfil their democratic aspirations in an own state, that is not repugnant."

He reportedly denied that blacks in the homelands were disenfranchised.

"They were not disenfranchised, they voted. They were not put in homelands, the homelands were historically there. If only the developed world would put so much money into Africa, which is struggling with poverty, as we poured into those homelands. How many universities were built? How many schools?" he asked.

# Again, posing questions in an open statement indicates sensitivity and tension at that place in
the statement. It suggests that there is undisclosed or concealed information.
"At that stage the goal was separate but equal, but separate but equal failed." He said he later became "a convert" against the system.

# The use of “At that stage..” indicates that in the speakers mind, there is a different goal in the present
time. The use of “I later became a convert against..” is a confirmer that the speaker is in agreement with
the current goal set.


FACIAL ANALYSIS
The face is well balanced and symmetrical. The subject is well used to posing for press photos, and is well at ease. However, I observe that the eye muscles work in synch with the mouth. The slight smile does not appear to be forced. The overall impression is that of an open and generally honest person.

Eyes, Lies, Analyse: Statement Analysis: Richard Mdluli

Eyes, Lies, Analyse: Facial Analysis: Statement Analysis: Clifton Coetzee Friday 11 May 2012 Richard Mdluli is quoted in an iAfrica news article as saying, inter alia: "For the past 33 years I have been in the police, I have never pulled the trigger and killed a person in my life," Analysis: "I never pulled the trigger" ( very specific ) vs I never pulled a trigger =This suggests he knows who pulled a (the) trigger in a specific incident or incidents. "I never pulled the trigger and killed a person" = the person was killed by other means, or I klilled him but not by gunshot. = The words strongly imply collusion or participation. Mdluli is older than 33yrs. The words (out of sequence now) "For the past 33 yrs I never killed a person in my life" are contradictory. It suggests that he never killed anyone in his first 33 yrs of life. RULE: There is no coincidence in a persons words. Everything said has a meaning and is reference to real life activities (past). A cognitive process takes place before words are uttered. We can say that Mdluli has a strong inner desire to tell his stories truthfully. The need to lie conflicts strongly with one's inner emotions - therefore it is not easy to lie.

Statement Analysis

Clifton Coetzee Friday 11 May 2012 Richard Mdluli is quoted in an iAfrica news article as saying, inter alia: "For the past 33 years I have been in the police, I have never pulled the trigger and killed a person in my life," Analysis: "I never pulled the trigger" ( very specific ) vs I never pulled a trigger =This suggests he knows who pulled a (the) trigger in a specific incident or incidents. "I never pulled the trigger and killed a person" = the person was killed by other means, or I klilled him but not by gunshot. = The words strongly imply collusion or participation. Mdluli is older than 33yrs. The words (out of sequence now) "For the past 33 yrs I never killed a person in my life" are contradictory. It suggests that he never killed anyone in his first 33 yrs of life. RULE: There is no coincidence in a persons words. Everything said has a meaning and is reference to real life activities (past). A cognitive process takes place before words are uttered. We can say that Mdluli has a strong inner desire to tell his stories truthfully. The need to lie conflicts strongly with one's inner emotions - therefore it is not easy to lie.

Rebekah Brooks

I have perused many photos of Rebekah Brooks. Her face usually presents as symmetrical and balanced. usually composed. Often her hair hides a portion of her face. This may be a fashion statement or it may be the curtain she hides behind.
In one photo attached she appears to be smiling and contented. Normal.

In the other photo, I see that the lhs eye is not in synch with the rhs eye.
The lhs eye is fixated and staring. The mouth wears a forced smile as the eyes are not smiling. The zygoma are not activated. I dont know whether Ms Brooks uses botox, which of course would negate any facial analysis.

In the pic where she is wearing a blue top (clutching plastic bag)the face is apprehensive. The contradictions in the four quadrangles suggest that the subject has distinctly different personalities that may come into play at different times.

UK Paedophile Gang

This is a screenshot taken of the 8 men arrested in the UK in connection with running a child prostitution ring. The picture is of low quality, yet one is still able to conduct a degree of facial analysis. Note the commonality of Left Eye Syndrome to most of these men.

Barack Obama

The face is generally symmetrical and well balanced. Both left and right faces are focussed and involved. The overall impression is that of a balanced and contented person.

The Eyes, The Lies, Analyse (Truth Extraction Contd)

Truth Extraction (Reading Between The Lies)was published circa 2000 by me, Clifton Coetzee (A Forensic Fraud Investigator), assisted by Malcolm Russel (A radio Broadcaster).


Subsequently, I established a 'Truth Extraction' investigative training module on MS Powerpoint and conducted many Truth Extraction training workshops and seminars during 2000 - 2008.

Truth Extraction techniques employ techniques of Statement Content Analysis; Statement Veracity Analysis (Criteria Based Content Analysis ); Kinesics (micro facial expressions, FACS and physiognomy). The latter leading me to conduct a study of faces and specific facial features, in turn leading me to initiate my 'Left Eye Syndrome' theory.

Subsequent to 2000, my work has led me to carry out an extensive edit of my first book and to add new content, including comparisons between SCAN and Voice Stress Analysis (VSA), specifically with a new automated VSA technology 'AVSAPRO'

My new work is titled TRUTH EXTRACTION Contnd (The Lies, The Eyes, Analyse)
In my latest book I place more emphasis on the visual cues than previously was the case.

SANRAL - Nazir Ali

In this case, the eye syndrom characteristics present on both sides, which represents appr 5% of persons displaying the tendency overall. Note that whilst the left eyebrow is lower, it is the right eye that is out of synch with the overall expression. The left eye is smiling, although the eye is hooded. The right eye has a fixated stare. The corresponding mouth outer edges are in synch with each eye expression.

Left mouth is smiling. Right mouth presents a smirk. Left side upper and lower eye muscles are activated, while right side is static. The overall expression is a contradiction.

Left Eye Syndrome

Still to be peer reviewed theory. Examine the persons face from square front on position. Observe the horizontal plane above the eyebrows. Usually the lhs eyebrow is noticeably lower than rhs. The left eye is eithe smaller and on a different plane (with a siamese appearance) Or, the left eye is much wider than the rhs and has a 'staring' appearance. In both cases above, the left eye appears to be flat and unfocussed, or outwardly unfocussed (outward squint) The left side of mouth usually ends well within the vertical line of outer eye edge. The left side of mouth often does not extend much beyond the outer edge of corresponding nostril. By contrast, the right side mouth edge extends beyond the outer edge of rs nostril and often in line or beyond the vertical line of outer eye edge. When the face is divided vertically, the left side appears disconnected and/or with a hint of menace. The right side face appears to be happy or content. Caution: As most (90%+) people are right handed, people that were on the receiving end of a facial assault would more than likely display any lasting injury effect to the left side face, usually around the eye area. I welcome readers to send me interesting face pics for discussion or analysis.